SCIREA Journal of Philosophy (ISSN: 2995-7788)

SCIREA Journal of Philosophy is an international, scientific peer-reviewed open access journal published online by SCIREA.

Open Access free for readers, with article processing charges (APC)paid by authors or their institutions.

High visibility: Indexed in the Google Scholar and other databases.

Rapid publication: manuscripts are peer-reviewed and a first decision provided to authors approximately 20 days after submission; acceptance to publication is undertaken in 5 days.

Recognition of reviewers: reviewers who provide timely, thorough peer-review reports receive vouchers entitling them to a discount on the APC of their next publication in any SCIREA journal, in appreciation of the work done.

Archiving

Volume 4, Issue 6, December 2024

Open Access
Weikang Zhu
Abstract: Moral paradox is a special contradiction in the world of moral phenomena, which is a result that appears in behavioral choices and has an absolute opposition and antagonistic nature between good and evil. The manifestation of the opposition between good and evil in the process of appropriate implementation of behavior choic
Abstract       References PDF (147 k) 10 Downloads     790 Views     DOI: 10.54647/philosophy720108
Open Access
Weikang Zhu
Abstract: As a topic, fraternity occupies an important position in western philosophy. Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Gadamer, etc. have all studied fraternity from different angles. In the history of Western classical thought, friendship is a highly political thing. At the same time, fraternity is also one of the important sources of w
Abstract       References PDF (143 k) 22 Downloads     803 Views     DOI: 10.54647/philosophy720109

Volume 4, Issue 5, October 2024

Open Access
Weikang Zhu
Abstract: Moral paradox is a kind of unique problems existing in human real life world. It is the different results people make for the same behavior based on different value judgment and value choice intention in some situations. And this result often has the contradictory nature of right and wrong, good and evil, beauty and uglines
Abstract       References PDF (183 k) 16 Downloads     827 Views     DOI: 10.54647/philosophy720103
Open Access
Weikang Zhu
Abstract: Moral paradox is a difficult problem perplexing logic, which is often difficult to solve in classical logic. Suing many valued logic has become a choice. As a solution to moral paradox, multivalued logic provides a thinking framework of the logic system that is different from the traditional binary logic. It helps us look a
Abstract       References PDF (162 k) 18 Downloads     855 Views     DOI: 10.54647/philosophy720104
Open Access
Weikang Zhu
Abstract: In the real society where qualitative culture prevails, people's psychological level is gradually losing their demand for freedom and liberation after being controlled. It seems to be a Utopia to expect some top-down political or economic liberation. In this regard, Marcuse shifted the starting point of liberation from the
Abstract       References PDF (146 k) 21 Downloads     1010 Views     DOI: 10.54647/philosophy720106

Volume 4, Issue 4, August 2024

Open Access
Weikang Zhu
Abstract: Human beings have been paying attention to moral paradox for a long time, especially in recent decades, moral paradox has been highly valued and studied by more and more scholars. Moral paradox, as a special logical contradiction in the real world of human life, is the spiritual product of human practice. Many years' resear
Abstract       References PDF (151 k) 16 Downloads     879 Views     DOI: 10.54647/philosophy720101
Open Access
Weikang Zhu
Abstract: When faced with multiple dilemmas of moral choice, self driving cars often cause moral and legal problems that make people think deeply. When the self driving car is in such an unavoidable dilemma that it is necessary to hit people, it will be a puzzle whether it is utilitarianism to kill one person and save multiple people
Abstract       References PDF (172 k) 15 Downloads     914 Views     DOI: 10.54647/philosophy720102

Volume 4, Issue 3, June 2024

Open Access
Igor Janev
Abstract: In the study of the general methodology of science and philosophy, we have discovered a common fundamental problem of the “paradox of the basic element” that creates inconsistencies in social and natural theory and general ontology and epistemology. Our study of the state interactions as a major international actor leads us
Abstract       References PDF (233 k) 2516 Downloads     22026 Views     DOI: 10.54647/philosophy720098
Open Access
Zhaolong Yuan, Cheng Zhang
Abstract: This paper first formalizes categorical propositions in syllogisms, then proves the validity of the generalized syllogism MAI-4, and then deduces other 15 valid generalized syllogisms from the syllogism MAI-4. In other words, there are reducible relationships between/among the 16 syllogisms. This study highlights the dialec
Abstract       References PDF (243 k) 20 Downloads     1245 Views     DOI: 10.54647/philosophy720099

Volume 4, Issue 2, April 2024

Open Access
Qing Cao, Hui Li
Abstract: This paper firstly proves that the syllogism EMO-4 is valid, and secondly indicates the validity of the other 14 syllogisms can be deduced from that of EMO-4 with the help of generalized quantifier theory, set theory, and first-order logic. And more valid generalized syllogisms can be deduced when one continues to infer. It
Abstract       References PDF (269 k) 23 Downloads     3516 Views     DOI: 10.54647/philosophy720092
Open Access
Jingyi Zhang, Yijiang Hao
Abstract: This paper formalizes Aristotelian modal syllogism within the framework of knowledge mining and subsequently proves the validity of the Aristotelian modal syllogism ▢EAO-3 through the application of modal logic and generalized quantifier theory. Moreover, by means of the integration of specific rules and facts derived from
Abstract       References PDF (215 k) 16 Downloads     1674 Views     DOI: 10.54647/philosophy720095

Volume 4, Issue 1, February 2024

Open Access
Qing Cao, Long Wei
Abstract: This paper firstly presents knowledge representations of Aristotelian modal syllogisms based on the structure of modal categorical propositions; Then, the validity of syllogism ⼞AA◇A-1 was proved by using the truth value definitions of these propositions. And then this syllogism was used for knowledge reasoning with the hel
Abstract       References PDF (271 k) 23 Downloads     33420 Views     DOI: 10.54647/philosophy720086
Open Access
Siyi Yu, Xiaojun Zhang
Abstract: Due to the large number of generalized quantifiers in the English language, this paper only studies the fragment of generalized modal syllogistic that contains the quantifiers in Square{all} and Square{most}. On the basis of generalized quantifier theory, possible-world semantics, and set theory, this paper shows that there
Abstract       References PDF (292 k) 28 Downloads     34762 Views     DOI: 10.54647/philosophy720087
Open Access
Feifei Yang, Xiaojun Zhang
Abstract: This paper firstly provides knowledge representations of Aristotelian modal syllogisms from the perspective of mathematical structuralism, and proves the validity of Aristotelian modal syllogism E⼞I◇O-4, and then by making full use of relevant definitions, facts, and some inference rules, formally derive other 30 valid moda
Abstract       References PDF (229 k) 30 Downloads     5581 Views     DOI: 10.54647/philosophy720089

Volume 3, Issue 1, February 2023

Open Access
Jing Xu, Xiaojun Zhang
Abstract: There is the reducibility between the generalized modal syllogism ☐AM◊I-1 and the other 20 valid generalized modal syllogisms. This paper first proves the validity of the generalized modal syllogism based on the truth value definitions of sentences with quantification, set theory and modal logic, then derives the other 20 v
Abstract       References PDF (249 k) 80 Downloads     86270 Views     DOI: 10.54647/philosophy720075
Open Access
Yijiang Hao
Abstract: With the help of the definitions of the inner and outer negative Aristotelian quantifiers, the symmetry of Aristotelian quantifiers no and some, the anti-syllogism rules and the subsequent weakening rule, this paper illustrates the reducible relations between valid Aristotelian syllogisms of different figures and different
Abstract       References PDF (203 k) 57 Downloads     98061 Views     DOI: 10.54647/philosophy720083

Volume 2, Issue 1, February 2022

Open Access
Givi Givishvili
Abstract: Three space experiments carried out in 2004-2018 placed all points on "i" in the discussion about the nature of space-time, which began with the apories of Zeno of Eleia. Experiments have proved that space-time does not exist physically. They are what Democritus called "nothing," unlike "what," which is associated with ever
Abstract       References PDF (407 k) 83 Downloads     86559 Views     DOI: 10.54647/philosophy72066
Open Access
Givishvili G.
Abstract: Empirical data in situ of recent years indicate that spacetime does not exist physically: they are not material - they do not have any of the characteristics inherent in material objects. At the same time, space-time is the most fundamental and universal mediator between all, without exception, material objects of Nature. I
Abstract       References PDF (337 k) 85 Downloads     86406 Views     DOI: 10.54647/philosophy72069
Open Access
Jon K. Amundson
Abstract: Though grief and loss have been normalized in mental health discourse, a particular class ofbereavement remains as diagnosis- Persistent Complex Bereavement Disorder. Discussion of thismore complex and enduring condition is undertaken in what follows. The dynamics of grief andloss are discussed through this diagnostic categ
Abstract       References PDF (175 k) 85 Downloads     86289 Views     DOI: 10.54647/philosophy72071

Volume 1, Issue 1, February 2021

Open Access
Valeri F. VENDA, Sergei S. Kostenko
Abstract: V. Venda discovered four laws of mutual adaptation and transformations (Voprosy Phylosofii, #2, 2017). Previously the laws were tested and practically used in development of new, the transformation learning theory, in prediction of social and economic transitions, in studies of human-computer interaction, design of safe wor
Abstract       References PDF (319 k) 71 Downloads     86838 Views     DOI: 10.54647/philosophy72059